Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1995PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division in each case should be affirmed.

In each of these appeals, defendants challenge the factual finding that their respective pretrial showup identifica tians were not unduly suggestive. In Clark, the record supports the determination that the identifications were not the product of police suggestion but rather spontaneous. One of the two robbery victims observed the perpetrator in a neighborhood market, asked the manager for his address, and then contacted the police with this information. Subsequently, the victims were escorted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DuuvonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. NewballNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. OellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. WillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. People v. LeibertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API