People v. Dixon
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*220OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
Defendant was identified as a mugger during a canvassing of the crime scene undertaken by the police and the victim in a patrol car for purposes of identifying the perpetrators. The question we must decide is whether the courts below properly concluded that the allegedly spontaneous nature of an identification rendered a Wade hearing regarding the procedure unnecessary. We conclude that the suppression court’s summary denial of defendant’s motion for a Wade hearing was improper, since the canvassing was a police-spansored procedure conducted for the purpose of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CasanovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.