People v. Pagan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The police arrived at the scene of a reported robbery and saw a group of people, including the identifying witnesses, barricading defendant. This did not constitute a police-arranged identification procedure (see People v Clark, 85 NY2d 886). Even if the encounter were to be considered a showup, there would still be no basis for suppression since it was prompt, on-the-scene and not unduly suggestive (see People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541).
Defendant’s argument that her plea was involuntary because it was made under the threat of a higher sentence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. DuuvonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. DozierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. BravoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. MirandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HackettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.