Legal Opinion

People v. Rivera

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1968PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

At the trial of defendant for the hold-up of a grocery store, two witnesses, the store clerk and a customer, unqualifiedly identified him. The witnesses had defendant under observation from a distance of one to five feet in a well-lighted store (“two big fluorescent lights ”) for at least three minutes.

No objection was made by the defendant to the testimony of identification by the witnesses. On cross-examination defendant adduced proof that one of the witnesses, Vargas, the customer *455who had been shot in the hold-up, identified defendant at a hospital where he was under treatment.

The other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API