People v. Rivera
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
At the trial of defendant for the hold-up of a grocery store, two witnesses, the store clerk and a customer, unqualifiedly identified him. The witnesses had defendant under observation from a distance of one to five feet in a well-lighted store (“two big fluorescent lights ”) for at least three minutes.
No objection was made by the defendant to the testimony of identification by the witnesses. On cross-examination defendant adduced proof that one of the witnesses, Vargas, the customer *455who had been shot in the hold-up, identified defendant at a hospital where he was under treatment.
The other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.