People v. Romero
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s pre-Miranda statement, while in custody, in response to a detective’s question regarding whether he would like to make a statement should have been suppressed. However, the error in failing to suppress the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence against defendant and there being no reasonable possibility that his statement contributed to the verdict (see People v Rivera, 57 NY2d 453, 456 [1982]). Additionally, there is record support for Supreme…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. SlivienskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. ElderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
- People v. ChinloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BurrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.