Legal Opinion

Godleske v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 1999No. 98 C 13716; CA A103288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus that challenged the lawfulness of a decision by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision to extend his parole release date by two years. He contends that the Board acted unlawfully by failing to follow the statutes and-rules on extending release dates that were in effect at the time that he committed the offenses for which he was convicted. We affirm.

The offenses for which plaintiff was imprisoned took place in 1983. He was scheduled for release on parole on December 6,1997. On June 18,1997, the Board extended his release…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frady v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Rodriguez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Hess v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Giblin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. McDade v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API