Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 2003No. A118811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

The primary issue in this case is what constitutes a “substantial question of law” for purposes of a motion for leave to proceed filed under ORS 144.335(6), relating to judicial review of orders of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. We conclude that a substantial question of law is presented by petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed with judicial review and grant the motion.

Unlike the ordinary process for judicial review of decisions of other administrative agencies in which briefing directly follows the filing of the record, pursuant to legislation adopted in 2001, a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Austin v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API