Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Houska v. Dickhaner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 5, 2010No. SC 90701PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Chief Justice.

James T. Panagos, LLC completed work for Jeffrey Houska, but Houska died without paying Panagos. Panagos first brought his claim for payment against Houska’s estate two-and-a-half-years later. The trial court held that the claim was barred under sections 473.444 and 473.360, RSMo 2000. 1 Panagos filed a motion for rehearing, which was granted to determine if section 473.444 violated Panagos’ due process rights.

The estate seeks an order prohibiting the trial court from reinstating the claim Panagos asserted against it. This Court issued a preliminary writ…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Jamison v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Henley v. BickelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Litzinger v. Pulitzer Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kevin Hillman, Relator v. The Honorable John D. Beger, and State ex rel. Erica J. Long, Relator v. The Honorable Fred CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. State ex rel. McKeage v. CordonnierSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Saint Charles County v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Dydell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API