Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 19, 2013No. SC 92649PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL C. WILSON, Judge.

William and Susan Smith lost their home in a foreclosure sale. When they failed to vacate, the foreclosure purchaser, Wells Fargo, sued for unlawful detainer. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Wells Fargo, and the Smiths appeal. The Smiths argue that, because section 534.210, RSMo,1 is unconstitutional, summary judgment was improper and the case should be remanded for consideration of their equitable defenses and counterclaims concerning the validity of Wells Fargo’s title. Section 534.210 is not unconstitutional and, because the Smiths failed to raise a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Jamison v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. DAVE R. WILLIAMS and CANDICE J. WILLIAMS v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., Defendant-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Hawley v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  4. Todd Hallquist v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  5. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. ConoverMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API