Legal Opinion

Hartness v. Allegheny County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1944No. Appeal, 99PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

Plaintiff, a pedestrian on the sidewalk in front of the County Court House in Pittsburgh, was struck by a mass of snow and ice which fell from the roof of that building. Claiming that the pitch of the roof was so sharp that there should have been a parapet or snow guards or some other device to prevent such an accident, plaintiff instituted an action against Allegheny County to recover damages for the injuries he sustained. His present appeal is from a judgment of compulsory non-suit entered against him,

There is such a multitude of opinions in our reports…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Ford v. Kendall Bor. Sch. DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Collins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. County of Bergen v. Port of New York AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Morris v. Mount Lebanon Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API