Legal Opinion

Glase ex rel. Limeburner v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1895No. Appeal, No. 239PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal, No. 239, Jan T., 1895, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1893, No. 776, refusing to set aside nonsuit. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned, among others, was refusal to take off non-suit.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

A number of adjoining buildings on the Schuylkill river, *490known as Fairmount Water Works, were erected and owned by the city of Philadelphia; they are used by the city as a pumping station; the natural surface of the ground slopes somewhat abruptly to the river, so that the roof of the engine-house, at the rear, is on a level with the ground; the roofs of all the buildings are on a level with that of the engine house, the whole forming a roof area of four hundred by fifty feet. This large roof surface looking out upon the river is used by the public, upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Hill v. Allentown Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Parker v. Matheson Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Styer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Paraska v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API