Legal Opinion

Keiser v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

"Worden, J.

The appellant was indicted for retailing intoxicating liquor to James Duke, without a license, and, upon trial by jury, was convicted.

One Jacob Sweigart, Jr., had a license to retail, and there was an agreement between him and the appellant, which was given in evidence, as follows-, viz.:

“Articles of agreement entered into this 5th day of February, A. D. 1877, by and between- John IT. Keiser, of Henry county, in the State of Indiana, party of the first part herein, and Jacob Sweigart, Junior, of said county and State, party of the second part herein, witnesseth. That said first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berthold v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Macy v. CombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Emmons v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Shaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Runyon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bradley v. ElyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Bond v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Delphos Hoop Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Heath v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Spaulding v. NathanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API