Legal Opinion

Runyon v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Criminal Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

The appellant was indicted for, and convicted of, the offence of selling intoxicating liquor without license. The liquor was sold under the following circumstances :

Samuel McKay had a license for the sale of such liquors at the time and place of the sale. McKay and Runyon entered into the following agreement, in virtue of which the liquor was sold by Runyon, viz.:

“ I, Samuel McKay, hereby hire George W. Runyon to act as my barkeeper, at my saloon on Massachusetts avenue, number forty-four (44), known as Pearl Saloon, and carry on said business for me for the period of one year from and after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Krant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Pickens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keiser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Heath v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. State v. DudleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API