Legal Opinion

Emmons v. Newman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ÁPPEAL from the Montgomery Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The appellant has assigned three’ errors; first, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the Complaint; second, that the court erred in refusing to give *373certain instructions asked by the appellant; third, that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial.

It is necessary to a proper understanding of the first assigned error that we should set out the complaint, which was as follows:

“Thomas Newman, plaintiff, complains of Alden Emmons, defendant, and says that on the first day of May, 1870, the said plaintiff and defendant entered into a co-partnership in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loomis v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Porter v. M'Clure & TourtellotNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Macy v. CombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Indianapolis Piano Manufacturing Co. v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Bradley v. ElyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Bond v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Heshion v. JulianIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Delphos Hoop Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API