Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Horton

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1930No. 2865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint is fatally defective in that it states facts which only establish, prima facie, a mere executory agreement between plaintiff and defendants "to combine their efforts and means in prospecting for, discovering and locating mines and mining claims, and that they should be equal partners in all of such locations and own in equal shares any and all such mining claims and mines so discovered, or in any manner acquired by either of them," but wholly fails to state any facts which establish or tend to establish that such agreement was ever executed or that such partnership was ever…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Moore v. CrawfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanguinetti v. StreckerNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. BiltzNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hamrick v. Hospital Service Corp. of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  4. Hurwitz v. Barr Ex Rel. BarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API