Legal Opinion

Tefft v. Schaefer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1925No. 19286. Department OnePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

— In 1906, the defendant corporation was organized as an ice and shingle company by the plaintiff Tefft, the defendant J. H. Schaefer, and one E. W. Schaefer. Tefft was made president and J. H. Schae-fer secretary-treasurer, and both were employed in the business at a salary of $100 per month. The stock was owned equally by the three organizers. Two years later, the Schaefers disposed of their stock; but later, in 1913, through failure of the purchasers to complete their contract, J. H. Schaefer, together with one G. H. Schaefer, came back into the corporation. At that time the ownership of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Russell v. Henry C. Patterson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Wonderful Group Mining Co. v. RandWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Sacajawea Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Skookum Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Grober v. KahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Matteson v. ZiebarthWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hein v. ForneyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Leppaluoto v. EgglestonWashington Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API