Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1901No. 3707PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thomas Carroll, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*493The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Reavis, C. J.

Appellant Parsons, original plaintiff, brings suit as a stockholder of the Tacoma Smelting & Refining Company against the corporation and the trustees thereof and the Tacoma Smelting Company, a corporation. The other appellants intervened, likewise as stockholders, and united with the plaintiff. Appellants, as minority stockholders of the Tacoma Smelting & Refining Company, pray the cancellation of a lease executed by the Tacoma Smelting & Refining Company to the Tacoma Smelting Company. Their complaints allege substantially that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. MacGinniss v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Dunbar v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Bay City Lumber Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Tefft v. SchaeferWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Butler v. New Keystone Copper CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API