Grober v. Kahn
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Weintraub, C. J.
The question is whether plaintiff is entitled to counsel fees and expenses incurred in proving his case. The trial court held our rule of court did not authorize an allowance. Grober v. Kahn, 83 N. J. Super. 382 (Ch. Div. 1964) . The Appellate Division, holding there was power to make an award, remanded the matter to the trial court for reconsideration in that light. 88 N. J. Super. 343 (App. Div. 1965). We granted cross-petitions for certification. 45 N. J. 596 (1965).
I
Plaintiff Grober was an officer of a corporation, Condenser Service…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Shulkin v. ShulkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Tefft v. SchaeferWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Tevander v. RuysdaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
3Cited by40 opinions
- Lansco, Inc v. Dept. of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Bedolla v. Logan & FrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- In Re NilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Joseph Polito and Loretta Polito, H/w v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.