Legal Opinion

Grober v. Kahn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 2, 1966PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintraub, C. J.

The question is whether plaintiff is entitled to counsel fees and expenses incurred in proving his case. The trial court held our rule of court did not authorize an allowance. Grober v. Kahn, 83 N. J. Super. 382 (Ch. Div. 1964) . The Appellate Division, holding there was power to make an award, remanded the matter to the trial court for reconsideration in that light. 88 N. J. Super. 343 (App. Div. 1965). We granted cross-petitions for certification. 45 N. J. 596 (1965).

I

Plaintiff Grober was an officer of a corporation, Condenser Service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Shulkin v. ShulkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Tefft v. SchaeferWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Tevander v. RuysdaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lansco, Inc v. Dept. of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Bedolla v. Logan & FrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. In Re NilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. Joseph Polito and Loretta Polito, H/w v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API