Legal Opinion

Matteson v. Ziebarth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1952No. 31776PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

This is an action by a minority stockholder of Ziebarth Corporation to set aside a merger agreement between that corporation and Snowy, Incorporated. He alleges that the agreement is illegal, unfair, and fraudulent. Named as defendant, in addition to the two corpora*289tions, is Robert Ziebarth, the majority stockholder of both corporations. Defendants joined in an answer denying plaintiffs characterization of the merger agreement. They also allege, affirmatively, that plaintiff is bound by the agreement because he failed to pursue the statutory remedy available to dissatisfied stockholders.

The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. General Inv. Co. v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Homer v. Crown Cork and Seal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,916 Howard Polin, Etc. v. Conductron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Miller v. SteinbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Gabhart v. GabhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Steinberg v. Amplica, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API