Legal Opinion

Leppaluoto v. Eggleston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1960No. 35367PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donworth, J..This is a derivative action brought by appellant as the owner of one half of the outstanding stock of Alaska Towing & Salvage, Inc., an Alaska corporation, against respondents Eggleston and wife as the owners of the remaining half of the corporate stock. Mr. Eggleston will herein be referred to as respondent, since his acts constitute the basis of the action. The corporation was also named as a defendant because it could not be made a party plaintiff. It will be referred to herein as ATS.

Appellant and respondent had known each other for more than twenty-five years prior to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Hayes Oyster Co. v. Keypoint Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In Re Kleinlein's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Williams v. Queen Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API