Legal Opinion

Jarostchuk v. Aricol Communications, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 31, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 96-0451PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

Plaintiff filed an untimely notice of appeal to superior court from an arbitration award in favor of Defendants. Defendants moved to strike the notice of appeal and Plaintiff moved for leave to file a delayed appeal on grounds of excusable neglect. The trial court denied Defendants’ motion and granted Plaintiff’s motion. Defendants appealed to this Court.

We hold that “excusable neglect” is the standard to meet when seeking a delayed appeal from compulsory arbitration to superior court. We also hold that the court abused its discretion in finding that the secretarial error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Park v. StrickArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Varga v. HebernCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Maher v. UrmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Decola v. FreyerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Valler v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Fisher v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API