Legal Opinion
Park v. Strick
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1983No. 16397-SAPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
This special action was filed after petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Ariz.R.Civ.P. 60(c) was denied by the trial court. 1 Having concluded that the case raises issues of substantive importance and that remedy by appeal is inadequate, we accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.Const. art. 6, § 5, and Ariz.R.Sp.Act. 4, 17A A.R.S.
On May 22, 1981, petitioner filed an action for dissolution of his marriage to the respondent, Dorothy E. Park. A decree of dissolution was entered after trial and petitioner made a timely motion for a new trial. This motion was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation, Robert M. Hensley v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Usaform Hail Pool, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Davis v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.