Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Edgerton
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 30, 2014No. 1 CA-CV 13-0428PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KESSLER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Susan M. Fisher appeals the superior court’s award of attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, and taxable costs pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 77(f) against Fisher in favor of her eo-defen-dant, Appellee Amy L. Edgerton. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 After a three-car, rear-end accident, the plaintiff alleged that Fisher and Edger-ton, who were driving separate vehicles behind her, were at fault. After compulsory arbitration proceedings, the arbitrator determined Fisher was 100% at fault and…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boisson v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, SinesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Duff v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Granville v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.