Legal Opinion

Gillogly, Admr. v. Campbell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

This action is appealed to this court. Its purpose is to subject certain property of a judgment debtor to payment of his debts, which property he had pledged by way of mortgage as security for his obligations. A solution of the controversy involves the construction of items five and six of the will of Manuel W. Campbell, under which will A. W. Campbell, the debtor, acquired an interest in or title to the property pledged. The- appellant is the successor in trust to the trustee named in the will, which will in part provides:

Item Fifth: I give and devise to William Hill in trust and in trust…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tax Commission v. OswaldOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In Re Estate of HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Taylor v. Executors of HuberOhio Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Simpson v. WelshOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Seltzer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  3. Wabash Valley Trust Co. v. Will of BellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Seltzer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API