Legal Opinion

Seattle First National Bank v. Crosby

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1953No. 31929PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

In this action, brought under § 4 of the declaratory judgment act, RCW 7.24.040, plaintiff trustee sought a declaration of rights and instructions with regard to certain assignments of principal and income of a trust made by William Shaw Crosby, the beneficiary thereof. From a judgment declaring that the trustee had no duty to honor any of the assignments and no right to honor the assignments of principal, all the defendants, except William Shaw Crosby, have appealed.

The allegations of the complaint (in which the documents material to this controversy were incorporated) were admitted by…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conaway v. Time Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Chapin v. CollardWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Keeler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Hans v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. DeGrief v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ball v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Burg v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Estate of Paxton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API