Taylor v. Executors of Huber
Ohio Supreme Court
Civil Action. Reserved in the district court of Fair-field county. On the 11th October, 1844, Jacob Huber made his will, in which he bequeathed to his son, Martin Huber, an equal share of his estate.
Read the full summary
Civil Action. Reserved in the district court of Fair-field county. On the 11th October, 1844, Jacob Huber made his will, in which he bequeathed to his son, Martin Huber, an equal share of his estate. The testator, Jacob, survived his son Martin, who died May 26, 1846, and on April 16, 1847, made.this codicil to his will: • “ My son Martin, having departed this life since I made my said will, leaving a widow and children, I do declare, will and direct that the said children of Martin shall succeed ta the distributive share which would otherwise have accrued to said Martin, in case he had…
1Opinion of the CourtBRiNKERHOEF, J.
There is no controversy among counsel in this case, but that on the death of the testator, the legacy bequeathed by his will became vested in" his grandsons, David and Levi, though subject to the charge upon it in favor of their mother during her life; that on the death of David, his share of it passed by descent, subject to administration, to Levi, and on his death, no provision having been made in the will for these contingencies, that the whole passed by descent, subject to administration, to their mother, the plaintiff, as their next of kin.
And it is claimed, in behalf of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cram v. GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1834
- Stiver v. Heirs of StiverOhio Supreme Court · 1837
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wilce v. VanAndenIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Angell v. AngellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1908
- Gillogly, Admr. v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Morgan v. First National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Puder v. AglerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.