Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Welsh

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERICK, PJ.

Now the plaintiff concedes that if the grandchildren, Charles F. Welsh and Lewis C. Welsh, took a vested estate in remainder under the terms of the testator’s will, at the death of the testator the matter is ended and she cannot be concerned with the manner in which her kin disposed of the property. But if the grandchildren took a contingent estate in remainder, ascertainable only at the death of Eleanor Welsh, then she is vitally interested and entitled to the relief sought. This latter view is, of course, claimed by the plaintiff, and presents the only issue in the case.

In view…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Tax Commission v. OswaldOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re Estate of HutchisonOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Crawley v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Mercantile Bank of New York v. Ballard's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gillogly, Admr. v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Bailey v. StedronskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API