Legal Opinion

Seattle First National Bank v. Crosby

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1953No. 31929Published

1Opinion of the Court

42 Wn.2d 234 (1953)

254 P.2d 732

SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee, Respondent,

v.

RHODA CROSBY, Individually and as Trustee, et al., Appellants.[1]

No. 31929.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 13, 1953.

Merle D. Cohn, for appellants.

Holman, Mickelwait, Marion, Prince & Black and Burroughs B. Anderson, for respondent.

Jacob Kalina (Michael S. Curtis, of counsel), guardian ad litem of Margaret Judith Crosby et al.

DONWORTH, J.

In this action, brought under § 4 of the declaratory judgment act, RCW 7.24.040, plaintiff trustee sought a declaration of rights and instructions with regard…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conaway v. Time Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Chapin v. CollardWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Keeler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API