Bowdren v. Aetna Life & Casualty
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
Anthony Bowdren appeals from the July 2, 1990 judgment on the order of June 12, 1990 by the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to vacate a portion of an arbitration award. The sole issue before us is whether a class two insured may stack the underinsured motorist coverage in a policy which contains a pro-stacking clause not limited to a particular class of insured individuals. We find that the trial court ruling is consistent with the current state of the law on this subject and accordingly, we affirm.
The uncontested facts may be summarized as follows.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Allstate Insurance v. McMonagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kosor v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Cotterman v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Cigna Insurance v. SquiresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Martin v. PMA GROUPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DeitrichDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.