Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pierce

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1992No. 78432PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUNTER, Judge:

Appellant filed a quiet title action claiming she owned, by virtue of adverse possession, a 2' strip of land running beside her driveway for about 51 feet. Appellee contended Appellant’s 15 years of holding the affected real estate openly, visibly, continuously, exclusively and with a claim of ownership had not run before he claimed ownership. The matter was tried to the court which found for Appellee. Appellant filed a motion for new trial which the court denied. We find the court erred as a matter of law. We reverse the order denying new trial and remand the matter for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. MacIas v. Guymon Industrial FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Christ Church Pentecostal, Now Wittich Memorial Church, a Corporation v. George H. RichterbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Conyers v. ConyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Franklin v. Hunt Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SMS Financial L.L.C. v. RaglandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API