Legal Opinion

Conyers v. Conyers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1963No. 39846PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

On January 12, 1960, defendant in error, Marian Rae Conyers, hereafter referred to as “plaintiff”, instituted an action against defendant in error, Henry W. Conyers, Jr., hereafter referred to as “defendant”, for a divorce, temporary alimony, attorney’s fees and a division of property accumulated during the marriage.

Plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as “executrix”, was permitted to intervene in the action. In her plea in intervention she alleged in substance that defendant and his father, Henry W. Conyers, Sr., who was executrix’s late husband, were equal partners in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lyons v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Iralson v. StangSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Campbell v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Kingfisher Improvement Co. v. Board of County Com'rs of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dodson v. Henderson Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Ely v. BowmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Chandler v. Independent School District No. 12Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Smith v. PierceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Conyers v. ConyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API