Legal Opinion

MacIas v. Guymon Industrial Foundation

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1979No. 51324PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPAL A, Justice:

The dispositive issue before us is whether in this case an adverse claimant’s possession may be tacked to that of his immediate predecessor in title and, when thus united, be deemed to extend for the requisite period of fifteen years. 12 O.S.1971 § 93(4).

The dispute stems from a mistaken location of a fence line separating two quarter sections of land. 1 The fence, which was believed to mark the correct boundary between the two tracts, was in fact 51 feet to the north of the section line. 2

In the suit below Alex and Rosa-mond Macias [claimants], owners of NW/4, sought to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Goen v. SansburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Naporra v. WeckwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Hurie v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Ellis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Tindle v. LinvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Krosmico v. PettitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Combs v. DuBoisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Lazoff v. PadgettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  5. Akin v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API