Eustis v. David Agency, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.
This appeal is from a summary judgment dismissing respondent as a third-party defendant in the underlying action. There, plaintiff brought suit against appellant to set aside a settlement and release agreement based on fraud, misrepresentation, mistake and improvidence. Appellant in turn joined respondent, plaintiff’s husband and attorney, as a third-party defendant seeking contribution and indemnity based on his alleged fraudulent/negligent conduct in negotiating the settlement. Appellant claims the trial court misapplied the law in dismissing its contribution…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stone v. SatrianaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Clark v. DruckmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- Brown v. LaChanceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Schuler v. MeschkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- TJD Dissolution Corp. v. Savoie Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.