Legal Opinion

Eustis v. David Agency, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1987No. C3-87-1280PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment dismissing respondent as a third-party defendant in the underlying action. There, plaintiff brought suit against appellant to set aside a settlement and release agreement based on fraud, misrepresentation, mistake and improvidence. Appellant in turn joined respondent, plaintiff’s husband and attorney, as a third-party defendant seeking contribution and indemnity based on his alleged fraudulent/negligent conduct in negotiating the settlement. Appellant claims the trial court misapplied the law in dismissing its contribution…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stone v. SatrianaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Clark v. DruckmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Brown v. LaChanceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Schuler v. MeschkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. TJD Dissolution Corp. v. Savoie Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API