Legal Opinion
TJD Dissolution Corp. v. Savoie Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 21, 1990No. C0-90-534PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant David Savoie claims respondent Robert Whitlock negligently represented him in transactions for the sale of his interest in a corporation to the remaining owners and the ultimate sale of the corporation to another buyer. The trial court granted summary judgment, finding that as a matter of law no attorney-client relationship existed between the parties. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant and his two brothers owned Savoie Supply, Inc. Respondent became the corporation’s attorney in the early 1970’s, and served as secretary to the board of directors. In 1980, appellant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of TrimontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Anoka Orthopaedic Associates, P.A. v. MutschlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Bremer Business Finance Corp. v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Carlson v. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.