Legal Opinion

Stone v. Satriana

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 25, 2002No. 01SA177PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

In this original proceeding, we examine whether attorney defendants in a legal malpractice action can designate the opposing party's current counsel as a nonparty at fault and subsequently disqualify that counsel.

Diane Stone was a defendant in a federal case that arose out of the City of Greenwood Village's investigation of Lawrence Ocrant's death. In state district court, Stone filed a legal malpractice action against her former attorneys, claiming that their malpractice caused the judgment against her in the federal suit. The former attorneys claim that Stone's eurrent counsel contributed…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Stump v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Gunn Infiniti, Inc. v. O'BYRNETexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bebo Construction Co. v. Mattox & O'Brien, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Wesp v. EversonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rantz v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Vinton v. VirziSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  4. Schuessler v. WolterColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API