Legal Opinion
Schuler v. Meschke
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 7, 1989No. C2-88-986PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants challenge the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. The trial court certified both questions as important and doubtful. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Respondents are a class of farmers who were members of American Energy, Inc. (AEI), a North Dakota cooperative. The farmers signed grower agreements to produce grain for AEI. The farmers come from North Dakota, South Dakota and Minnesota. Appellant Pringle and Herig-stad is a law firm with…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Maness v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Schwartz v. FrankenhoffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Anoka Orthopaedic Associates, P.A. v. MutschlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Christian v. BirchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Trident Enterprises International, Inc. v. Kemp & George, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.