Legal Opinion
Minnesota Milk Producers Ass'n v. Madigan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1992No. 91-1594PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
The Minnesota Milk Producers Association and its directors (the producers) appeal from the District Court’s dismissal of their suit seeking to have certain provisions of milk-marketing orders issued by the Secretary of Agriculture enjoined and declared invalid under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (AMAA), 7 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq. We reverse and remand.
*817On January 17, 1990, the producers filed this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., challenging certain provisions of milk-marketing orders covering marketing areas east of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pescosolido v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Farmers Union Milk Marketing Cooperative v. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
3Cited by15 opinions
- Adams v. Watson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Alto Dairy v. Ann Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, and Continental Dairy Products, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Minnesota Milk Producers Ass'n v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United Dairymen of Arizona Shamrock Farms Company v. Ann M. Veneman, Secretary, United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.