Legal Opinion
Alto Dairy v. Ann Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, and Continental Dairy Products, Inc., Intervening
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 15, 2003No. 02-3422PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Dairy farmers located mainly in Wisconsin brought this suit to enjoin an amendment to the federal rules regulating the price of milk. (The amendment adopted by the Department after a formal rulemaking proceeding, is published at 7 C.F.R. § 1033.7(c)(2); and explained in Milk in the Mideast Marketing Area; Interim Order Amending the Order, 67 Fed.Reg. 48743 (July 26, 2002).) These rules are called “milk marketing orders,” and so the amendment is also a milk marketing order. The district judge held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the amendment, not in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Arkansas Dairy Cooperative Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Allina Health Services v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Lamers Dairy Incorporated v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Michael ChaparroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.