Legal Opinion
Pescosolido v. Block
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1985No. 84-1820PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Carl Pescosolido, Marvin Wilson, and Oleah Wilson (the Growers) brought this action under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (the Act), 7 U.S.C. §§ 601-624, seeking to compel the Secretary of Agriculture (the Secretary) to terminate Federal Marketing Order No. 907, 7 C.F.R. Part 907 (1984) (Order 907), and also seeking declaratory relief and damages under the Act. Jurisdiction in the district court was alleged under the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702, and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The district court held that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Arkansas Dairy Cooperative Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Love v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Wileman Bros. & Elliott, Inc. v. GianniniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Tucson Airport Authority v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.