Legal Opinion
United Dairymen of Arizona Shamrock Farms Company v. Ann M. Veneman, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 12, 2002No. 00-16213PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider whether under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (“AMAA” or “the Act”), as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§ 601-626 (2001), Appellants United Dairymen of Arizona (“UDA”) and Shamrock Farms, two Arizona milk producers, have standing to bring a direct suit challenging the producer-handler exemption. We conclude that Appellants cannot bring a direct suit challenging the exemption and affirm the district court’s decision.
BACKGROUND
Demand for milk fluctuates from day to day and from season to season. Due to the fluctuating demand and to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. RuzickaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pescosolido v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Alto Dairy v. Ann Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, and Continental Dairy Products, Inc., InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc. v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- United States v. Freddie TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.