Legal Opinion

Smith v. McKinstry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1945No. Civ. 14780PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*96WOOD (W. J.), J.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $2,950, damages awarded by the court for false representations made by defendants in the exchange of real properties owned by the respective parties. Plaintiffs were the owners of residential rental property in Hawthorne, Los Angeles County. On October 27,1942, they entered into an agreement with defendants for the exchange of this property for a ranch located in the State of Washington which had been owned by defendants for about ten years. The agreement was consummated and the parties took…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Antonelle v. Board of New City Hall CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Haime v. De BeaulieuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. KindtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of National City v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. First National Trust & Savings. Bank v. CervenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Smith v. McKinstryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API