Legal Opinion

Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1942No. Sac. 5508PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— This is an appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant. After the trial judge had or*137dered the judgment, findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived by written stipulation of counsel. On this state of the record every intendment is in favor of the judgment, and it is presumed that every fact essential to the support of the judgment was proved and found by the court. (Gray v. Gray, 185 Cal. 598 [197 P. 945] ; Miller v. Pacific Freight Lines, 40 Cal.App.2d 451 [104 P.2d 1069] ; Gordon v. Mount, 125 Cal.App. 701 [13 P.2d 932]; 24 Cal.Jur. p. 956, and cases there cited.)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McHenry v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Bacon Service Corporation v. Huss.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McHenry v. AlforeSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API