Antonelle v. Board of New City Hall Commissioners
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court, in a proceeding in mandamus, commanding the board of new city hall commissioners to allow a certain demand of respondents payable out of the new city hall fund. The transcript consists merely of the pleadings, the judgment, and a notice of appeal therefrom. The case was tried without a jury, and findings were waived. The complaint (or petition) states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and to authorize the issuance of the writ prayed for, and was attacked only by a general demurrer. All the issues made by the pleadings…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Moreno Mutual Irrigation Co. v. Beaumont Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Green v. DarlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Stewart v. LangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.