Legal Opinion

Myers v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1958No. 34333PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

In this automobile accident case, an order granting a new trial, limited to the issue of damage alone, is here for review. Appellant, defendant below, contends that judgment should be entered on the $4,100 verdict, which is undivided between general and special damage, or, in the alternative, that the new trial should be upon all issues. Respondents, husband and wife, plaintiffs below, contend that the verdict is conclusive on the issue of liability, but that the smallness of the verdict, $4,100, indicates the jury was motivated by passion and prejudice, and that the trial court correctly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. FerebeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Holt v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Mina v. Boise Cascade Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Shaw v. BrowningWashington Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API