Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 Respondents are 11 pipe fitters (the pipe fitters) who are former employees of appellant/cross-respondent Fluor Federal Services, Inc. (Fluor), a company with operations on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation near the Tri-Cities. The pipe fitters prevailed at trial on their claims of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy based on their allegations that they were discharged for raising safety concerns or supporting those who did so. Division Three of the Court of Appeals certified the case to this court, and it was transferred in its entirety to this court for decision on the merits.
¶…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Viking Bank v. Firgrove Commons 3, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- River House Development, Inc. v. Integrus ArchitectureCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Behnke v. AhrensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.