Shaw v. Browning
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The jury, in this case, returned a verdict for damages in the sum of $813.43 for personal injuries which, assuming the injured plaintiff was entitled to recover, was grossly inadequate. The trial court granted a new trial limited to damages.
The defendants appeal, urging: (1) that judgment should have been entered on the verdict; and (2) if a new trial is to be granted, it should be on all issues. As a corollary to (2), it is urged that there were two instructions given by the trial court which were erroneous and may have influenced the verdict on the issue of liability.
The first contention is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greenwood v. the Olympic, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Ide v. StoltenowWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Myers v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Vaughan v. Bartell Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by24 opinions
- Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Cameron v. BooneWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Irving v. BullockAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.