Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fortune

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2005No. A107402PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEPULVEDA, J.

Defendant Debra Renee Fortune entered a plea of no contest to a charge of welfare fraud and was placed on probation with specified conditions, including the payment of restitution. The amount of restitution to be ordered was contested and thus determined after submission of written argument on the issue. Ultimately the trial court agreed with defendant’s proposed method of calculating the amount of restitution, and ordered defendant to pay $3,235 in restitution of cash benefits paid by the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKS) program (formerly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. ThygesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. AkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. People v. DalvitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. Anthony M.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. BrunetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. K.F.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. TabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API