Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Akins

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 2005No. A107616PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea, Lashondra Akins (defendant) pleaded no contest to one count of welfare fraud. The court placed her on probation for five years, on condition that she serve 90 days in county jail. It also ordered defendant to pay restitution to the Department of Health and Social Services of Solano County (Department) in the amount of $9,789. The People filed an appeal, contending that the court should have ordered restitution in the amount of $10,158, based upon the Department’s calculation of overpayment of food stamps and cash benefits.

We shall hold that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. ChappeloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. People v. BeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. FortuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. ProsserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. P. v. Petronella CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API