Legal Opinion

Common School Dist. No. 58 v. Lunden

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1951No. 7744PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

On the day this cause was argued, respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript does not contain or show proof of service of notice of appeal, required by § 13-202, I.C. Appellants suggested augmentation to include an affidavit of service originally filed with the clerk of the district court, but omitted from the transcript. The proof being examined and found sufficient the augmentation is ordered, and the motion to dismiss is denied. Mendini v. Milner, 47 Idaho 322, 276 P. 35; Henderson v. Nixon, 66 Idaho 780, 168 P.2d 594; Guiles v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stein v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Harrison v. Board of County Com'rsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gould v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gasper v. District Court of Seventh Judicial Dist.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Rim View Trout Co. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fitzpatrick v. WelchIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Interest of DunmireIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Nicolaus v. BodineIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API