Legal Opinion

United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1993No. 243PA91PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

We allowed defendant Share Corporation’s petition for discretionary review in order to consider whether and to what extent a claimant who successfully prosecutes both a common law claim and an unfair practices claim under Chapter 75 of our General Statutes is required to elect between remedies when both claims arise out of essentially the same conduct.

This case has occupied the parties and the courts for a number of years. The essence of it is that plaintiff, United Laboratories, Inc. (United), employed defendant Kuykendall to sell chemical products. The employment…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Ellis v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. First Atlantic Management, Corp. v. Dunlea Realty, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Moore v. City of CreedmoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API